Where do you see the ISEQ trading 1 year from now? i.e. Oct 2009
1000-2000
50%
[ 7 ]
2000-3000
29%
[ 4 ]
3000-4000
7%
[ 1 ]
4000-5000
14%
[ 2 ]
Total Votes : 14
Poll closed
Author
Message
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:11 pm
Audi
There will always be work to do. If we end up with a stable population and all the houses and offices we need, with clean water and good sewerage treatment and renewable power supply then there is maintenance and the Arts, culture, music. You could also have move time spent on education, care for elderly, healthcare, education etc etc etc. Then there is science, engineering, pure research and space. There is lots to do what we lack is leaders with imagination.
johnfás
The flight to London is a good idea. Make a weekend of it and go to the theatre. The drive from Clare to Belfast sounds like hell on a winters night. Agree with you about Edinburgh and Newcastle. Newcastle was a real surprise to me there is a lot going on there. Elton Square is another large shopping centre right in the centre of Newcastle. Can be cold in those parts in winter.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:40 pm
Audi. Stop annoying Alex about carbon because it is looked upon as tin foil hat stuff over here. People like Ibis would be looked upon as Loons.
You seem to watch this beardy guy a lot. He is right that the thing to watch is the bond market, I closely follow it. I disagree with him that this 30 year bond auction was a disastor. The tail he refers to of .1% was not bad at all and the number of bids while being low was not too bad either. Considering that the treasury sold 181 billion of different maturities I think things went well.
It can not continue to do well though and I will be on hand to discuss it when the interest rates jump. Most don't even know that this could happen much less expect it.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:59 pm
youngdan wrote:
Audi. Stop annoying Alex about carbon because it is looked upon as tin foil hat stuff over here. People like Ibis would be looked upon as Loons.
You seem to watch this beardy guy a lot. He is right that the thing to watch is the bond market, I closely follow it. I disagree with him that this 30 year bond auction was a disastor. The tail he refers to of .1% was not bad at all and the number of bids while being low was not too bad either. Considering that the treasury sold 181 billion of different maturities I think things went well.
It can not continue to do well though and I will be on hand to discuss it when the interest rates jump. Most don't even know that this could happen much less expect it.
I'd be lying if I said I understand that bond stuff youngdan. Beardy man thinks it was terrible anyway and said the Treasury lost 185 million or something ??? Was it only 10 billion worth of 30 year bonds that were being sold ? And how often are 30 years bonds sold at all ? Any good writers or blogs you'd recommend if a person was interested in that bond stuff ?
Beardy (Nick) was also talking about the Fed interest rate target being 1% but I don't understand that either. He was saying the average effective rate has been around 2.3% . You'd think America was half in tatters looking at some of the news such as GM and all but it probably isn't at all. You've lots of consumption and productive capacity obviously and if you think your 30-year bond sales went well then that's all very positive for the U.S. because there's obviously tons of interest/faith in the economy internationally.
I still think ye're downright greedy eating 20 million out of a 87 million world barrels of world oil consumption per day and the CO2 should be an excuse. Alex needs to be told those things.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:43 pm
Beardy might be only paying close attention only for a short time to the US bond market, who knows. The 30 year bonds are sold every 3 months by the Treasury. These are brand new bonds. Remember that all 30 year bonds that were issued for the last 30 years are still in existance and are traded each day in the bond market. These are the bonds he was referring to when he said that 30 year bonds fell 2 and 8/32. That was a big fall but lads would be looking to sell for numerous reasons, for example they might believe that China was going to sell some of the 30 year bonds they hold to get cash for their stimulas package.
The money he said the treasury lost refers to the extra money the treasury will pay because the interest rate was .1% higher on some of the debt than the average rate paid. This is an auction so different bids get filled at different rates till the 10 billion is allocated. There is always a spread between the bids and the high bids are a bit too eager and get to pay a bit more than average(end up with a lower rate of intesest) The lower bids luck out and end up paying less(end up getting a higher rate of interest). There was 10 billion on offer and there was about 21 billion of bids. There were 11 billion of bids that went home enpty handed. There bid prices were not high enough(they were hoping to force the treasury to pay a higher interest rate)
I missed where he was talking about 1% but that is the Fed funds target rate. This and the discount rate are the only rates the Federal Reserve can influence. The Fed Funds rate changes every day but the Fed takes action to keep it close to 1%. The Fed Funds rate is the interest rates on money lent between banks each night so that they have enough cash to obey the law with regard reserve requirements.
I don't say the sales went well I am saying they did fine all things considered. There is a bit of buying in short duration bonds out of fear but to be able to sell these long term bonds was an achievement. I am expecting a coppapse of this market and am surprised it is doing so well.
I don't know where you would learn about this stuff except a book but it really is not complicated. If you want to just keep a gereral eye on things just pull up Yahoo finance and after it lists the dow, nasdaq and sp it list the 10 year bond. You will see the interest rate change each day. If you see it rise above 4.25 you can pay serious attention.
Do you have a link to the Jones comments
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:57 pm
youngdan wrote:
Beardy might be only paying close attention only for a short time to the US bond market, who knows. The 30 year bonds are sold every 3 months by the Treasury. These are brand new bonds. Remember that all 30 year bonds that were issued for the last 30 years are still in existance and are traded each day in the bond market. These are the bonds he was referring to when he said that 30 year bonds fell 2 and 8/32. That was a big fall but lads would be looking to sell for numerous reasons, for example they might believe that China was going to sell some of the 30 year bonds they hold to get cash for their stimulas package.
The money he said the treasury lost refers to the extra money the treasury will pay because the interest rate was .1% higher on some of the debt than the average rate paid. This is an auction so different bids get filled at different rates till the 10 billion is allocated. There is always a spread between the bids and the high bids are a bit too eager and get to pay a bit more than average(end up with a lower rate of intesest) The lower bids luck out and end up paying less(end up getting a higher rate of interest). There was 10 billion on offer and there was about 21 billion of bids. There were 11 billion of bids that went home enpty handed. There bid prices were not high enough(they were hoping to force the treasury to pay a higher interest rate)
I missed where he was talking about 1% but that is the Fed funds target rate. This and the discount rate are the only rates the Federal Reserve can influence. The Fed Funds rate changes every day but the Fed takes action to keep it close to 1%. The Fed Funds rate is the interest rates on money lent between banks each night so that they have enough cash to obey the law with regard reserve requirements.
I don't say the sales went well I am saying they did fine all things considered. There is a bit of buying in short duration bonds out of fear but to be able to sell these long term bonds was an achievement. I am expecting a coppapse of this market and am surprised it is doing so well.
I don't know where you would learn about this stuff except a book but it really is not complicated. If you want to just keep a gereral eye on things just pull up Yahoo finance and after it lists the dow, nasdaq and sp it list the 10 year bond. You will see the interest rate change each day. If you see it rise above 4.25 you can pay serious attention.
Yeah I suppose the best way of finding out about this stuff is just watching beardy and asking the likes of yourself. At this stage I'm just picking up vocabulary but I'll get the hang of it after a while. It was informative when you were posting about municipalities issuing bonds - I hadn't realised that happened. I'll just plod along like that so.
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:07 pm
Squire wrote:
Ard-Taoiseach
With falling retail price index perhaps time to renegotiate wages down, reduce benefits and reduce the minimum wage! We could also insist on a reduction in the salaries of TDs
Inflation should fall by at least half over the next year with a 1% inflation figure for 2009 not impossible and certainly probable. Oil prices are plummeting, commodities in general are imploding, interest rates are falling, house prices continue to slide, there is a glut of cars on the market, unemployment is a natural restraint on inflation and that is continuing to rise. Inflation has only one way to go and that is down.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:13 pm
Ard-Taoiseach wrote:
Squire wrote:
Ard-Taoiseach
With falling retail price index perhaps time to renegotiate wages down, reduce benefits and reduce the minimum wage! We could also insist on a reduction in the salaries of TDs
Inflation should fall by at least half over the next year with a 1% inflation figure for 2009 not impossible and certainly probable. Oil prices are plummeting, commodities in general are imploding, interest rates are falling, house prices continue to slide, there is a glut of cars on the market, unemployment is a natural restraint on inflation and that is continuing to rise. Inflation has only one way to go and that is down.
I heard this earlier too. What's all the baloney about the printing of money and the hyperinflation on the way then ? Would it be possible - given all the things you mention above - gluts and commodity mountains - wouldn't it be likely that a bit of extra money around will be responsible for soaking up surplus inventory lying around ? Is that why they've risen the Social Welfare in the budget when you'd imagine that it would be frozen for now or with a very low rise only. I suppose it wasn't that much after all. But won't that extra money if it gets printed (Paulson is talking about bolstering Amex with bailout money so people can spend again - another way of getting the lubricant to the seized-up bits) just mop-up the extra stuff that was produced and needs to be shifted ? The government trying to move a rake of houses mightn't count however.
Can money be directed to where it is needed most i.e. where as much inventory and stock will get soaked up as possible and an entire clear-out sale happen before the shelves are restocked with new shtuff.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:22 pm
Auditor #9 wrote:
I heard this earlier too. What's all the baloney about the printing of money and the hyperinflation on the way then ?
I don't know from where it's coming because the actual prices of goods, be they oil, gas, platinum, copper, coffee and cocoa are falling quite sharply at the moment. These falls are being transmitted to finished goods now with input cost growth falling sharply and registering a negative value in increasing cases. In this environment, hyperinflation is hard to envisage, especially considering the muted growth of M3 money supply.
Quote :
Would it be possible - given all the things you mention above - gluts and commodity mountains - wouldn't it be likely that a bit of extra money around will be responsible for soaking up surplus inventory lying around ? Is that why they've risen the Social Welfare in the budget when you'd imagine that it would be frozen for now or with a very low rise only. I suppose it wasn't that much after all. But won't that extra money if it gets printed (Paulson is talking about bolstering Amex with bailout money so people can spend again - another way of getting the lubricant to the seized-up bits) just mop-up the extra stuff that was produced and needs to be shifted ? The government trying to move a rake of houses mightn't count however.
Can money be directed to where it is needed most i.e. where as much inventory and stock will get soaked up as possible and an entire clear-out sale happen before the shelves are restocked with new shtuff.
Directed by whom? The Government? No, the money will(or at least should be) directed by market forces. Market forces are more efficient allocators of resources than governments as they take a greater account of willingness to pay and where the effective demand lies. I say let the market decide where a particular stimulus in the money supply goes.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:35 pm
Couldn't the money be directed by criteria or parameters ? So, if money gets printed for banks to distribute as loans then that money gets put out at different interest rates depending on the use. Again if you want to future-proof your house with energy stuff then the bank should give you a low-interest loan of 3% or something. Maybe less - hasn't Japan got interest rates of nearly zero ?
How does Central Banking and the tugging at interest rates square with the free market forces you love so much ? You must have the horrors when Central Bankers mention interest rate cuts and hikes ?
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:40 pm
Auditor #9 wrote:
Couldn't the money be directed by criteria or parameters ? So, if money gets printed for banks to distribute as loans then that money gets put out at different interest rates depending on the use. Again if you want to future-proof your house with energy stuff then the bank should give you a low-interest loan of 3% or something. Maybe less - hasn't Japan got interest rates of nearly zero ?
If banks feel that offering low interest rates on loans to do with environmental issues like insulating your house, buying solar panels, getting triple-glazed windows and so on is a marketable idea, then they should be let do that. If there is profit to be had in it, the market will provide.
Quote :
How does Central Banking and the tugging at interest rates square with the free market forces you love so much ? You must have the horrors when Central Bankers mention interest rate cuts and hikes ?
Well Central Banks are the market makers in this situation. They are the original sellers of money, they are like farmers and miners selling raw materials to manufacturing companies to make into marketable goods. Central banks input the raw materials into the money market so I am comfortable with them.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:32 am
The idea that there is a free market is a bit of a myth. Right now it can be seen just how blatant that lie is. All markets need rules and regulation but again it is obvious that the dice are loaded against the average individual.
IMO there are several forces at work;
(1) The free market which is a jungle where everyone tries to gain or derive income or capital gain. In that jungle there lie predators and there is usually prey. All goes well and the victims don't really notice they are being mugged and the fat cats become sleek until something destroys the habitat. The herbivores die and the cats go hungry.
(2) Governments. Now these are strange beasts. Some want to milk their country dry and deposit the money in Swiss bank accounts. Some consider only their re-election and perpetuating their own regime. Others have dreams of power and world domination. Many are fronts for vested interests. A few (usually Nordic) may even have concerns about the standard of life of their citizens.
How governments influence the market is truely perverse. They manipulate the value of their currencies, they subsidise their industries, they place import duties on goods, or have unbelievable procedures for importing goods, buying property or setting up business. Some even dictate what levels of profit you can make and others what percentage of sweetener is necessary to do any business at all. Governments prevent a free market and only seek to regulate where it impairs a competitors trade.
Right now recession is the problem, but eventually there is a limit to how much a country can print or lend. Eventually no one will take the bonds unless they are well paid and equally print enough notes and you will soon need wheelbarrows to carry the money to pay for the groceries.
I have been running down my activity for over 2 years and if I suddenly felt I could see a clear opening it would take 1-2 years to start to employ all but a few people. I simply hate sitting around and I am trying to think of areas that are recession proof or where there will be a good demand when there eventually is an upturn. Right now indicision rules. I don't feel I can gage it properly.
My guess is we are in recession right through next year and well into 2010. The retail price index will be in negative figures. This is bad for the housing market as inflation was always a good tool to quietly correct over values. A house at £200,000 in the UK (where the index is -2%) would need to cut its price by £4000 to remain at the same relative position. In this environment loans are bad news and cash is king.
Interest rates are going to drop. In the UK 1% is highly likely. The ECB will do likewise.
I would worry about inflation late 2011 - 2012 at the earliest.
Total guess be interesting to see if I am wrong.
Still think the DOW will go down below 7500 and the FTSE 3500. ISEQ will not rise until the main markets find a floor. If the Shanghai Composite is down 64% on the year why should I think the FTSE or DOW would do much better?
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:47 am
Squire: the very cheapest houses will sell. Someone I know just launched and sold ten houses at 170,000 € in a fortnight.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:53 am
CF
If you reduce most things low enough they eventually will sell. The question is can you build them and make a profit and in a years time what will the price then be. Housing in Ireland is too risky.
Likewise if you invest in energy production based on an assumption that oil will be over 100 dollars a barrel then when in the future will that happen. Get it wrong and you could be carrying a loss for a considerable time.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:58 am
Squire wrote:
CF
If you reduce most things low enough they eventually will sell. The question is can you build them and make a profit and in a years time what will the price then be. Housing in Ireland is too risky.
Likewise if you invest in energy production based on an assumption that oil will be over 100 dollars a barrel then when in the future will that happen. Get it wrong and you could be carrying a loss for a considerable time.
These weren't reduced: they were priced and built accordingly and the profit is as planned. The very top and the very bottom of the market maintained activity in the Thatcher housing crash:this time around I think the top is crashing too - but the cheapest new house is selling.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:33 am
Fair play to them. The cost of the sites is key in this equation. Also there must be a demand locally.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:34 am
Tomorrow could change everything but for the moment we will go with what is known.
Ireland has no control over anything and deflation rules for the moment. I have said this for a long time now everyone agrees. You are about to see a jump in crime and suicides. Lads will be hanging themselves off every tree this winter. They can't handle tough times.
That been said hyperinflation is a certainty. For the sake of Ireland this must kick in as soon as possible. Unfortunately they stuck their head in the Euro noose and now they can choke.
The onset of hyperinflation and rising interest rates will be sudden and can not be far away. Britain looks to be leading the way and BrownBottom is scrambling tomorrow and we await to see.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:40 am
Squire wrote:
Fair play to them. The cost of the sites is key in this equation. Also there must be a demand locally.
Absolutely. The people who lost the heads and paid double the odds since 2006 couldn't do that. They wouldn't have paid double the odds unless the banks hadn't been backing different people to bid each other up to those amounts - competition for economic oblivion.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:35 am
youngdan I see you there. Do you know the youtubist "Vision Victory" ? He's now making twenty minute youtubes - he's very popular and is potentially singularly responsible for a lot of the food-hoarding going on in the states right now.
I find him professional-looking, smart and has a simple and direct style but also some urgency. He reports that 401Ks are being confiscated by the Govt. (is this the same as our national pension reserve fund here?) and he thinks the Dow will go to 1500. He is apocalyptic in the most matter of fact way. As I said he is very popular and he should be one of the fellas worth watching as this financial deal in the U.S. unfolds
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:55 am
Where do you find all these lads. I don't have a 401k but I don't think they could be compared to the fund that someone wassaying was going to be grabbed to give to the Irish banks. A person here has more control on what he invests in with his 401k. He pays in what he decides and his employer matchs it to a point. I am no expert on them as I say but everyone sees how much they have lost recently.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:15 pm
youngdan wrote:
Where do you find all these lads. I don't have a 401k but I don't think they could be compared to the fund that someone wassaying was going to be grabbed to give to the Irish banks. A person here has more control on what he invests in with his 401k. He pays in what he decides and his employer matchs it to a point. I am no expert on them as I say but everyone sees how much they have lost recently.
So someone can invest their 401k in Bear Stearns etc. eek. That guy above says we could see a new world stockmarket happening and that the Dow will end up thinner than the ISEQ; he says basically Americans are too indebted which, going into a depression which he claims is on the way, is a very different situation to the Great Depression where people had to spend their savings going into the Great Depression and were left with none afterwards. Now people are indebted up to their eyeballs and will have nothing to spend. Many of these youtubers are seeing visions of soup-kitchens stretching across America I'd say if not worse. Recently in the independent here there was even a report that soup kitches in Dublin were seeing over 100% more action in the past 6 months. Are people that bad ? Apparently when you're let go from work here you must wait 6 weeks for your dole - if you don't have 6 weeks worth of savings then you're knackered - you'd have to go to a soup kitchen. How bad I suppose.
youngdan
Some of these fellas are interesting with their youtube channels. I click on the "Related Videos" below the main fella on the right and if there is one there with a high number of views I'll click on that I've given an example below. The Related Videos must mean that the youTube application groups together the general kind of stuff that people are watching. Some of these people are very popular - great amateurs in their bedrooms and all. "Vision Victory" has had over 5000 views since yesterday for example and many of those would be because many are subscribed to his channel. He said he had 600 email replies to his last video and apologied for not being able to reply to them all.
Youtube is great like that with the channels - people can have their own television programme effectively - it's very Anarchistic. If you had a good face for TV you could have your own channel in a shot youngdan. VV gets up to 70,000 views for some of his videos which is handsome. He's very well organised though and gives out a good structured video-blog quoting newspaper and other sources. You could blind them with suckawilly and Golden Brown and all them fellas.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:37 pm
It is a young person's game mostly as I only know the very basics about computors
It would be handy though for this site ifsomeone figured how to put clips of ourselves up argueing back and forth. It would capapult the site forward.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:39 pm
youngdan wrote:
It is a young person's game mostly as I only know the very basics about computors
It would be handy though for this site ifsomeone figured how to put clips of ourselves up argueing back and forth. It would capapult the site forward.
Great idea - perhaps all we would need is our own youtube page?
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Sat Nov 15, 2008 10:07 pm
I don't know how it would work but we would want to keep it under the machinenation umbrella. Is Kate not a journalist. Let her interview say my pal Willie O dee and we can ask him questions and then she could either have our written responces or video responces put together as a video. We would be going from print to video in a way
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Sat Nov 15, 2008 10:20 pm
youngdan wrote:
I don't know how it would work but we would want to keep it under the machinenation umbrella. Is Kate not a journalist. Let her interview say my pal Willie O dee and we can ask him questions and then she could either have our written responces or video responces put together as a video. We would be going from print to video in a way
We were trying that indirectly with the Margaret Wahstrom thread - but the session wasn't under our control so our questions weren't asked.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000 Sun Nov 16, 2008 1:22 am
There was a lad that made a name for himself early in the primaries here by interviewing the lesser candidates early on. People want real questions rather than fluff questions. This is more a problem here than there though for a few reasons.
Sponsored content
Subject: Re: The ISEQ Thread Part II - Trading below 2000