Development Issues

I though this thread wasn't supposed to be about Libertas, yet I count 18 mentions on page five alone.

Double standards and duplicity abound!

[MOD]If the thread drifts off course into a discussion about Libertas, it will be moderated accordingly. People are of course entitled to mention any group relevant to Lisbon. [/MOD]

Now you are getting paranoid Cookie, I myself have been reassured that the posters here are not in the least concerned that Ganley could have any support at all, none at all I tell you. none none none nothing they reassure me.

A leopard does not change his stripes. Surely nobody expects Papal to rely. He is just preaching to the stupid congregation

So I see you've removed my post now. Nice, real nice. Looks like I was spot on about this place all along.

cookiemonster wrote:

So I see you've removed my post now. Nice, real nice. Looks like I was spot on about this place all along.

What post, cookiemonster?

cactus flower wrote:

cookiemonster wrote:

So I see you've removed my post now. Nice, real nice. Looks like I was spot on about this place all along.

What post, cookiemonster?

I replied to this:

Quote :

[MOD]If the thread drifts off course into a discussion about Libertas, it will be moderated accordingly. People are of course entitled to mention any group relevant to Lisbon. [/MOD]

nonsense.

Lo and behold my reply now ceases to be.

What was the substance of the post, cookie ? Can you reply to it now again ?

You replied " nonsense " ?

Well, I don't see a lot of harm in that. But I would defer to the modding group.
I've pmd a query.

Auditor #9 wrote:

What was the substance of the post, cookie ? Can you reply to it now again ?

Reply again, what is this, the Lisbon treaty?

cookiemonster wrote:

Auditor #9 wrote:

What was the substance of the post, cookie ? Can you reply to it now again ?

Reply again, what is this, the Lisbon treaty?

cactus flower wrote:

You replied " nonsense " ?

Well, I don't see a lot of harm in that.

You wouldn't, you do it all the time.

Quote :

But I would defer to the modding group.
I've pmd a query.

Don't put yourself out, Dear.

Well it seems Ibis fucked up and accidentally deleted it.

All's well that ends well, eah?

cookiemonster wrote:

Well it seems Ibis fucked up and accidentally deleted it.

All's well that ends well, eah?

Can you give us the gist of the post at all ?

Auditor #9 wrote:

cookiemonster wrote:

Well it seems Ibis fucked up and accidentally deleted it.

All's well that ends well, eah?

Can you give us the gist of the post at all ?

Can't be arsed, it would only be met with yet more anonymous hyprocritical nonsense from the "moderators". Once they're finished accidentally deleating my posts, that is.

cookiemonster wrote:

Auditor #9 wrote:

cookiemonster wrote:

Well it seems Ibis fucked up and accidentally deleted it.

All's well that ends well, eah?

Can you give us the gist of the post at all ?

Can't be arsed, it would only be met with yet more anonymous hyprocritical nonsense from the "moderators". Once they're finished accidentally deleating my posts, that is.

You don't have to post here.

ibis wrote:

You don't have to post here.

You don't have to delete my posts either.

cookiemonster wrote:

Auditor #9 wrote:

cookiemonster wrote:

Well it seems Ibis fucked up and accidentally deleted it.

All's well that ends well, eah?

Can you give us the gist of the post at all ?

Can't be arsed, it would only be met with yet more anonymous hyprocritical nonsense from the "moderators". Once they're finished accidentally deleating my posts, that is.

Well that won't happen again unless it's outrageously offensive.

Discussion of Libertas' isn't excluded at all from the thread but content similar to other Libertas threads will or should be moved from here to there.
Now, are we going to get back on the topic of this thread or go for some bottles of buckfast in the Sibin Reoite ?

Lads come on, let's calm the whole thing down here. Ibis accidentally deleted a post, that has been established. I presume that matter has now been resolved between ibis and cookiemonster. Feel free to be pissed off cookiemonster, frankly given the circumstance I would be too.

However, would you ever grow up and make a contribution to this thread, which has dealt with many of the substantive issues and has actually been very light on its discussion of Libertas. You have made nigh on a dozen contributions and not one of them has been relevant to the actual issues being discussed. This must constitute a bit of a waste of time on your part so why not put your time to better use and tease out the issues of the Treaty.

I suggest a trip to the Sibín and on your return let the discussion return. I am going to move all these discussions to a separate thread in a few minutes once people have had time to examine this thread.

Auditor #9 wrote:

Discussion of Libertas' isn't excluded at all from the thread

Well it seems it was at the beginning, or at least that was the intention of Cactus Flower when she started this thread and so, it seems, was it recognised to be the case by several other posters. However, it didn't remain the case, did it? And it too was less than complementary but yet it remains and was engaged in by many other posters and moderators including the one who started the thead.

cookiemonster wrote:

Auditor #9 wrote:

Discussion of Libertas' isn't excluded at all from the thread

Well it seems it was at the beginning, or at least that was the intention of Cactus Flower when she started this thread and so, it seems, was it recognised to be the case by several other posters. However, it didn't remain the case, did it? And it too was less than complementary but yet it remains and was engaged in by many other posters and moderators including the one who started the thead.

It was intended that this thread not become a discussion about Libertas - no more, no less. The OP does state that Libertas can be discussed.

The person making it most about Libertas is you, Cookie, not anyone else.

johnfás wrote:

However, would you ever grow up and make a contribution to this thread, which has dealt with many of the substantive issues and has actually been very light on its discussion of Libertas. You have made nigh on a dozen contributions and not one of them has been relevant to the actual issues being discussed. This must constitute a bit of a waste of time on your part so why not put your time to better use and tease out the issues of the Treaty.

And talk of X-factor is what exactly?

cookiemonster wrote:

johnfás wrote:

However, would you ever grow up and make a contribution to this thread, which has dealt with many of the substantive issues and has actually been very light on its discussion of Libertas. You have made nigh on a dozen contributions and not one of them has been relevant to the actual issues being discussed. This must constitute a bit of a waste of time on your part so why not put your time to better use and tease out the issues of the Treaty.

And talk of X-factor is what exactly?

What possible relevance does the existence of another thread have to do with your contributions to this one?

ibis wrote:

The OP does state that Libertas can be discussed.

o rly?

cactus flower wrote:

I'm starting this thread, with the idea that the Lisbon Treaty can be discussed here in a Libertas/Ganley-free environment.

ibis wrote:

cookiemonster wrote:

johnfás wrote:

However, would you ever grow up and make a contribution to this thread, which has dealt with many of the substantive issues and has actually been very light on its discussion of Libertas. You have made nigh on a dozen contributions and not one of them has been relevant to the actual issues being discussed. This must constitute a bit of a waste of time on your part so why not put your time to better use and tease out the issues of the Treaty.

And talk of X-factor is what exactly?

What possible relevance does the existence of another thread have to do with your contributions to this one?

It's not another thread, it's this one. https://machinenation.forumakers.com/the-open-europe-forum-f30/the-second-lisbon-referendum-t1626-75.htm

cookiemonster wrote:

ibis wrote:

The OP does state that Libertas can be discussed.

o rly?

cactus flower wrote:

I'm starting this thread, with the idea that the Lisbon Treaty can be discussed here in a Libertas/Ganley-free environment.

More fully:

Quote :

A second referendum seems inevitable. I'm starting this thread, with the idea that the Lisbon Treaty can be discussed here in a Libertas/Ganley-free environment. In fairness, you are asked also to keep any party political pointscoring out of the thread and focus on the merits of the case.

I think that's perfectly clear on the idea that Libertas is not the subject, and neither is any other kind of party-slagging.

cookiemonster wrote:

ibis wrote:

cookiemonster wrote:

johnfás wrote:

However, would you ever grow up and make a contribution to this thread, which has dealt with many of the substantive issues and has actually been very light on its discussion of Libertas. You have made nigh on a dozen contributions and not one of them has been relevant to the actual issues being discussed. This must constitute a bit of a waste of time on your part so why not put your time to better use and tease out the issues of the Treaty.

And talk of X-factor is what exactly?

What possible relevance does the existence of another thread have to do with your contributions to this one?

It's not another thread, it's this one. https://machinenation.forumakers.com/the-open-europe-forum-f30/the-second-lisbon-referendum-t1626-75.htm

That is a brief off-topic interlude, as opposed to repeated eruptions of irrelevant bellyaching.