- ibis wrote:
- This is the kind of thing that I think is a problem with DNA databases - once in existence, they get extended in all kinds of ways.
In this case it's a cop out to avoid dealing with the issue of troubled or difficult kids in a more resource intensive way.
Strangely though, I saw that headline in yesterday and assumed that it was something to do with child protection, as opposed to criminalisation, following on from the recovery of the little girl who had been missing.
I wonder would people's attitudes be different if that was the case?
I don't see that it's possible to prevent that brave new world - though I imagine I'll be well advanced in years by the time DNA is required to order a lunchtime sandwich.